There can be no society without poetry, but society can never be realized as poetry…. Sometimes the two terms seek to break apart. They cannot.
                          — Octavio Paz

I work by asking how any act, from a poem’s aesthetic decisions to a transaction like publication, can be an instance of what else the world can be. I am not a neutral actor in any of this, but a witness and participant in the possible. 

After the release of my last book of poems, Dark~Sky Society, I understood in a new way the limits of work that’s simply a witness to violence, that it could also participate differently in our violent society. I could see, like any gardener, that whatever I would grow thus needed to include attention to the

S O c I a L 
I needed to leave the page, work in projects that blur the line between literary and social forms. My two newest books, one poetry and one nonfiction, are both “embookbodiments,” blending literary and participatory art forms in order to collaborate with readers. I’m particularly interested in supporting new roles for white people, like myself, since the imagination of whiteness seamlessly infects our gestures, whether artistic or social. My art practice aims to disrupt extractive social relations as a necessary step in remaking society. I value: 

  • low barriers to entry 

  • communal actions that recenter inherited, extractive power dynamics

  • small adaptations/projects that have big multiplier effects in the social fabric

  • life-giving refusals (I/ we are not for sale or co-optation)

  • experiences that light us up, and give us energy to keep going

In the classroom, my art practice has shown up as decentering my authority in order to support student-led praxis. That led out of the classroom into all my communities, working with others to build together in a kind of “classroom of the world.” In these local gathering projects I aim to take on burden and risk; for me this is a crucial gesture if we will collaborate across sometimes starkly asymmetrical power relations. For instance, I don’t take credit ie present the work on my resume, social media, or receive payment. Attention to the different burdens/benefits of all collaborators enables us to focus on care and trust. It is also a refusal of the normalized exploitation baked into most professional “standards.”

I am influenced by apprenticeships to black liberation movements, liberatory pedagogies, and guerrilla intellectuals; longtime training in engaged Buddhism; and in conflict transformation. And by my upbringing: raised white in majority-black Washington DC; spending time in my mother’s country, Ireland; and being a child of a disabled father from the US south.

I understand the world as dominated by forces that willfully ignore calls for accountability and integrity while hiding behind narratives that say otherwise, a brutal tactic that’s also numbingly familiar. I see my practice and collaborations as a key step in dissolving those forces, by accessing the deeper layers——in personal experience or institutional policies—- where the dis-owned parts of society lie. I want my work to allow us each to access these as remedies: in our bodies, poems, conversations, and communities.